"White" Men, Physicality and Conflict

The popular culture is trying to demonize white people, and white men in particular. At the same time it promotes victim/loser culture and the ego and narcissism of people who believe their main attribute is being disenfranchised. The recent video of the Democratic Socialists of America convention, or whatever that mess was, shows the outcome of that mode of thinking--a comically weird combination of hyper passivity (victim Olympics) and hyper aggression.

Young men of my generation and probably older (gen X) were heavily socialized against physical violence as a method of resolving conflict. (I don't know about the younger generations.) Really, the implicit lesson was, violence is bad, and it's not necessary to resolve conflicts with weak people because they don't matter. The real conflict is with the natural order, history, or whatever. That is, the heroic struggle is important, and everything else is nonsense. That's probably one of the reasons people despise corporations and going to a 9-5 job. It is just nonsense. There's almost no honor in it.

Now, a whole army of losers and feebs are being programmed to defeat the White Man who is still busy wrestling with the forces of nature, at least in his collective mind. Just as the white man didn't get the tools and training to interact with feebs and losers, the feebs and losers didn't get the training to interact with white men in their terms.

Instruction of the White Man in the loser victim culture doesn't seem likely to have the desired outcome. If anything, it's likely to deepen the gulf in understanding. Similarly, the people that aren't in the phony category of "white" that aren't losers, probably won't want to stay in that victim mode.

The main reason I think ethno-nationalism is so stupid is the virtues and ideals of man don't really have anything to do with race or ethnicity. In fact, the "muh white people" mode of thinking is firmly in the loser/victim culture.