Solving Problems Nobody Has

A point I return to over and over is nobody really needs the crap the economy keeps cranking out. Let's take "5G" networks. The 4G network was all built out, then within maybe a year or two, "5G" network equipment began replacing all that stuff. I was perfectly happy with my 4G service. I could watch videos, etc... on my android phone anywhere. I don't notice an iota of difference with 5G stuff even after my network provider spent billions on it.

Similar things happen with Wi-Fi. I lost track of all the Wi-Fi standards a long time ago. We have a relatively old, but very reliably Wi-Fi access point in my house. We stream videos, transfer files around, etc... with no problems. Why would I buy another one? There's new standards that offer very fast data rates, but who cares?

The push for EVs wall all synthetic. The central planners offered up all kinds of great benefits from those, but they're really not a great substitute for gasoline powered cars, and are not even close to offering a meaningful replacement for diesel powered heavy equipment.

There's a sort of maniacal compulsion to push more and more tech crap instead of perfecting and reducing the costs and impact of existing tech. In fact, that "perfecting" mindset seems to have disappeared everywhere in the world. For a while, it was the Japanese manufacturing/engineering approach, but even they seem to have largely abandoned that idea.

I guess that's all to be expected since the world seems to be governed by psychopaths and degenerates; it looks like a cult of satanist perverts basically runs the world as more and more of the epstein dirt spills out. How could anything sensible happens when evil trash set the agenda?

Olympics--the "West" is Rotten

The "Epstein Files" reveal how "the world" really works. The dumb public gets scammed and pushed around by a club of degenerates who's full time job is staying in the degenerate's club. They ingratiate themselves to each other on a regular basis in a monkey-like grooming ritual via electronic communication and by hanging out and depraved partying. The emails in the Epstein files provide a glimpse of that monkey behavior.

I have some relatives who work in "soft skill" businesses like journalism or PR. That monkey-grooming behavior goes on all the time in their workplace. They buy each other birthday presents and that kind of thing. I've been working in tech and industry since the 90s. Nobody I ever worked with knew my birthday and vice versa. I never bought a present for a boss. I didn't have to. It never crossed anybody's mind because we were actually making and doing things.

To stay in the Epstein club, senior government official monkeys would give Jeff some insider trading tips so they could go hang out on the island, I guess, get wasted and have sex with underage girls or boys mainly kidnapped from Eastern Europe. In other cases super rich people apparently ask for the most banal advice on dating and that kind of nonsense to prove they were chums.

This pattern of "club" behavior is pervasive. For example, the "official" critics of Epstein are just in different clubs, where maybe they're not total degenerates sexually, but their "authority" to comment comes from their membership and club credentials, rather than their person, individual skills or their own thoughts--in fact they really don't have any of their own thoughts. This wikipedia banner ad evidences how these creatures really think:

The members of the club who are somehow associated with the wikipedia want the quaint outsiders of "the world" to present their "cute" folklore and fancy costumes to the club, who will curate, collect and display it, and most importantly "acknowledge" it. When I used to listen to NPR years ago, I noticed that theme was common. Essentially an emissary of the western club would go out and collect "native" culture, like some guy would play a pipe flute or sing to a drum or whatever. For some reason it would be presented as significant to American dudes in Ohio or Michigan.

Anyway, the clubs have that inside/outside pattern and the membership views its thinking job as assembling info to present to the "inside" rather than an independent quest for truth. In fact, those who do have some independent skill or self-developed knowledge can get co-opted by these clubs and turned into a mascot or totem for the dumb grooming-monkey type. That seemed to be one of Epstein's main occupations. He would seek out and promote public intellectual types who were often all-too-happy to get attention.

This brings me to what the Olympics really is for. The club basically claims "ownership" of the athletes and their skill. The abilities of the athletes lends legitimacy to the club. This happens with other professional sports as well, but the Olympic games is a big monopolistic co-opting orgy. The "jet set" cliques of the world all get together and party while some highly trained athletes entertain them. The banal hubris of the club members gets legitimized by proxy.

Anyway, I think when civilization persists for a long time, it utterly rots out. The current iteration of "the west" is the british/jewish globalist/jet-set club. Everything is a corporation. It's all setup to allow Epstein type people to replace the public's equity and ownership of literally everything with money tokens and to force participation in a game that benefits people like Epstein and his "friends".

Last of the Mohicans

I recently did a cross country flight to the west coast. Along the way, I watched The Last of the Mohicans movie which covers one of the really interesting parts of US history, the French-Indian War. One of the reasons that period of history is so interesting is the frontier of the then colonies was where I live today in Ohio, which was then the so-called "Northwest Territory".

The main character in The Last of the Mohicans is played by Daniel Day Lewis. The character "Natty Bumppo" is a ranger, like Aragorn in The Lord of the Rings. The ranger character is interesting, because he is on the frontier beyond the rules of society. "Society" is always and everywhere a corrupt cesspool, so the "ranger" character is one of the very few people who can truly be a whole/good man.

In the northwest territory days of Ohio, the corrupt gangsters of France fought with the corrupt gangsters of Britain over the remote country where neither gang was very powerful. In that scenario, the ranger type character acts outside the power pyramid and its arbitrary rules and necessarily deals with the natural order of things.

In other words, the frontier is the only place men can be full men, and where there can be actual justice and natural order.

James Fenimore Cooper wrote the book in the 1820s. It's interesting the lost America was being idealized when the country wasn't even 100 years old yet.

Another weird, tangential aside is the Ford Ranger truck embodies that concept of the Ranger character. The current Ranger, though, is not really a "ranger". The nissan equivalent of the old Ford Ranger is the Frontier.  

There's No "Fix" Possible

The "Epstein Files" show how thoroughly corrupt the whole system is in explicit, weird detail. One recent detail is a lawyer lady in the Obama administration was a buddy of Epstein and got payola for fixing problems for the Rothschild family. The Rothschild family got rich by being fixer and financiers for European ruling class trash back in the 17th century. This type of relationship between "elite" people goes back thousands of years. The so-called "Norman Conquest" was an invasion of England by another similar set of psychopath trash, possibly the great-grandpappys of the modern day psychos that play the game of thrones today. They proceeded to extort and murder their way to full control of the entire population of England back in 1066.

Anyway, it's pretty obvious there is a trans-national "ruling class". That category of people has very little to do with elected governments, except large numbers of government and corporate officials live in the swamp of corruption surrounding those people, in fact, their full time occupation seems to revolve around staying in that club and trading favors with their buddies in it. The media creates an smell of legitimacy to the whole thing by interviewing them and agreeing to their formalisms, like "titles" and honorifics. Ex post facto, the worst trashbucket scum like Winston Churchill get statues and historian propagandists puffing their names up. Trump, who is basically just a mafioso, will get that type of treatment in spite of the apparent "hate" the lefty people have for him.

These people seem to be largely incompetent at their official jobs, but are very good at staying in their club. The scumbags that sold the Iraq war for example all failed their way to cushy payola jobs in banks or NGOs or corporations.

Many people wonder how to "fix" this situation. Setting aside feasibility, the "fix" would be an absolute purge of the ruling class and their families, which is probably a genetic reset of the European population--maybe eliminating psychopathy and certain behavioral characteristics. Boardrooms, prestigious universities, yachts, private airports, castles, mansions, government offices would all be empty. That's foolishness. Another crop of psychos would actually pop up in their place and the same patterns would emerge. It might only take a generation, maybe less, for it to happen.

There's not really a systemic fix, either. The problem is the population. People are way too dependent on the system and especially "money" and little trinkets the system provides. The Obama lawyer lady accepted expensive slave-made handbags from Epstein, for example, in addition to millions in payola from the Rothschild businesses, all that stuff is really just a signifier of membership in this club of jet-set trash.

Movies like 10,000 B.C. or Stargate or Conan the Barbarian depict this system as an externally imposed thing with a historical beginning in the ancient past. It's probably an emergent property of masses of people. 

Tracy Twyman Death

A few years ago the "pizzagate" conspiracy theory was making the rounds. The researcher and author Tracy Twyman and some actor who's name now escapes me (It's Isaac Kappy), began investigating it in earnest. They possibly managed to find some site used by child traffickers. Both of them ended up "dying". Twyman's death was deemed a suicide. There seemed to be a concerted attempt to smear her after she died or was murdered. She was depicted as a druggie and insane.

I listened to her on podcasts for years and read a number of books she published. For example, she wrote a great book about the origins of money called Money Grows on the Tree of Knowledge. Was she "crazy" or a drug addict? I suppose she could have been, and still be lucid enough to compile works on esoterica and speak at length on the same topics.

Isaac Kappy supposedly died after "jumping off a bridge" in Arizona after basically posting a suicide note on Instagram instead of making a video post about it.

It's quite a coincidence that she and Kappy both "died" on their quest to uncover the so called "elite pedophile rings".

Anyway, maybe someone will actually release some definitive information via the "Epstein Files". Maybe some new version of Snowden will leak the un-redacted files in their entirety.

Mentions of "Jerky" In the Epstein Documents

 The Epstein "files" are available through the department of justice web site. You can search for keywords here. I read there are many mentions of "jerky" in the files.... there are. It seems like some kind of code word. It's mentioned a bizarre number of times by several different people. People start to speculate about what these code words could mean: are the "elite" trashbucket psychopath weirdos eating human flesh? Babies?

People Who Want a Huge Government

There are lots of people who became convinced the world needs a thermostat, and think a person like Bill Gates or someone similar should control the thermostat. Coincidentally, many of the most famous spokespeople for this general concept were associates of Jeffrey Epstein. Weirdly, it seems in addition to being global control freaks, they have hobbies like child rape and watching snuff films.

Anyway, their core concept is the world "needs management (them)". They claim if left to its own devices everything would fall apart. This is the main religion of the "lefty" people. That is, the world is broken and they can fix it.

Another mass of people, the "right" wing people tend to think individual skill and merit creates small patches of order in a sea of otherwise chaos, that is, it's you versus nature.

Both of these perspectives are based on variations of the "ego" relationship with external reality, that is the inner world model of reality.

In the lefty case, the ego is basically a pulsating sensitive vagina exposed to harsh reality. Only when the world is ordered by gays and women so there aren't even mean words, or even gestures that offend the most sensitive vagina person will the world be "fixed". They tend to go on ridiculous crusades and lead societal "reforms" and push strongly for social engineering. In prior eras, for example, they banned booze. In today's era they're big on censorship and control of person to person interaction in corporations or entities like schools.

The "right" pretends to want a smaller government and less control, but they end up making the government bigger all the time and want money for all their particular causes.

Both these groups put strong emphasis on their "beliefs" and their team. If you're not on their team and share their beliefs, you're an enemy. It's pretty common today for people to imagine a weirdo or deviant person is on the other team.