Mega-distortions of History

When I was in middle school I had a couple of books called "The Penguin Atlas of World History". The books were printed on an unusual, fairly dense paper, and were kind of small but heavy for their dimensions. Unfortunately, they were also bound in a kind of slipshod fashion and eventually they fell apart because I read them frequently. They basically told a story of "the world of men" in maps. I was always particularly fascinated with the so called "age of migration" in the early medieval world when european people were moving around because it was presented as a sort of "beginning" point of europe, therefore of my ancestors.

However, even when I was 12 or so, that didn't make any sense for very basic reasons. It was an entirely arbitrary "beginning" because of course those people who migrated to europe came from somewhere else and in fact europeans had been living in that region for tens of thousands of years prior, so the narrative was nonsensical. I read and re-read the sparse text of that book to try to understand what I was missing, but never found it.

The reason I didn't find it was the info in the book was presented out-of-context because the authors of that book were Germans and they were presenting "the official narrative" they learned in school which conflated "the beginning" of europe with its christianization. For example former President of France Charles deGaulle said:

"For me, the history of France begins with Clovis, elected as king of France by the tribe of the Franks, who gave their name to France. Before Clovis, we have Gallo-Roman and Gaulish prehistory. The decisive element, for me, is that Clovis was the first king to have been baptized a Christian. My country is a Christian country and I reckon the history of France beginning with the accession of a Christian king who bore the name of the Franks."

There's a specific mega-distortion in histories that for whatever reason I tuned into at the age of 12 or so. Historical narratives are presented as a necessary sequence of events with rational causes and effects rather than entirely contingent and arbitrary outcomes. The "official" narratives are carefully crafted lies that are trademarked by the ruling class and inculcated into the population via schools in the present day. A "good student" is just a parrot. Even in a nominally "free" society while an individual can say or write almost anything they want, only the ruling class opinions, that is, the official story is set on blast.

When I was looking at those maps of medieval europe as a 12 year old kid, I was trying to figure out why the europeans abandoned their prior religion and became "christians". No such explanation is in that book because it's understood as a necessary "watershed" moment. Over the subsequent decades of my life, I tried many times to research the subject, but no authors presented it in a manner that makes sense to me, that is, it was an entirely contingent thing and the current timeline is really a series of arbitrary outcomes.

One obvious example of that in the historical record is the early version of christianity in Europe was so called "Arian" christianity, but that was replaced with a different trademarked version of christianity--catholic christianity. It seems pretty likely the catholics murdered the guy who had the trademark on Arian christianity. To this day catholics recite the "nicene creed" which commemorates how the "church fathers" settled the beefs they had 1700 years ago with poison.

Another more recent version of this historical distortion is found in the history of the settlement of Ohio. In retrospect, the outcome was always "up in the air" and often times events were farcical, such as the French claims on "ownership" of the New World which turned into British Claims, then American Claims. Each claim was based on a prior fraud, and the ostensibly "competing" governments colluded to bolster their legitimacy. Of course, this lesson can't be taught in a school even though it's the most important lesson of that era.

In other words, the claim of History as a subject is: things came to be as they must, that is, they were pre-ordained and the current order of the world is "just" because it won. This is how the "christianization" narrative is presented in many books, even by secular scholars. I recall reading a book that presented christianity "winning" out in darwinian fashion over the prior religion. Some authors make bizarre claims that became really widespread like christianity "created" the concept of being an individual that is the "content" of the christian religion won out over the content in the germanic religions because it was intrinsically better.

That's not what happened at all. Christianity's the ultimate example of something that's entirely contingent and arbitrary. For example, the "core" of christianity is actually Greek philosophy, but because it started off as a jewish cult it's associated with the bible which some modern religious christians still regard as a historical narrative rather than a collection of Mediterranean world myths. Both the jews and the greeks had been absorbed into the roman empire and as rome collapsed as an organized political/military entity its religious institutions morphed into the "Roman Catholic" church.

As with the "settlement of Ohio" narrative, because all the parties involved were weak AF, the series of events that followed, like the "baptism of Clovis I" was all pretty arbitrary and could have turned out any number of ways. Two weak players, Clovis and the early catholic church partnered up to bolster each other, but any number of other gangsters of that era could have buddied up and formed a winning combo. The search for an answer "why they won" as in, it was a necessary outcome, is an ex post facto distortion. It really "just happened to work out".

A very weird modern wrinkle on this "necessary cause and effect" narrative is the variations introduced by women's studies or black people studies or native american studies. That is the "official ruling class narratives" are now ammended with mentions of a woman, or a black, or whatever, but the overall theme remains the same. For example, one uncomfortable fact of French settlement of the new world is the Indians bartered their women's beavers to the French like they bartered their beaver pelts and in fact, they did it in gratuitous fashion. Basically the women would put on a strip-club type show and offer up their asses since they didn't share a language. The leadership of the Indians basically pimped out their hoes for material gain. The narrative has to be altered to make this a woman-power move.

The core of all this bullshit is to make it seem like the world is as it must be, which is of course what the ruling class people want everyone to believe. The reality is its entirely contingent and nobody can really make a claim on "legitimacy". It just doesn't exist.

Perpetual Psychosis

There is a plaque in Fairport Harbor that commemorates the French explorer La Salle's trip through the area in the 1600s. 

Nations like France would base their claims of ownership of vast territories on some French dude setting eyes on it first. That was the "Doctrine of Discovery". The dude would often perform a ceremony of some kind as well, like erecting a cross or installing a lead plaque, or some other such thing. They would also make these claims to the Indians in various ceremonies, presumably in French, but I don't know that for sure.

At the time, and definitely in retrospect, such claims were absurd yet grown ass men who were officials of a government earnestly made those claims after much trouble and expense and years of their lives. Those claims were joined with the construction of forts, which were basically part of the beaver pelt trade network the French built. Other nations, like the British, would sometimes dismiss those claims as nonsense, and sometimes would acknowledge them as the basis of treaties for transfer of "ownership" of a region. The Americans, also would acknowledge these claims, for example, in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, the government paid Napoleon millions of dollars for land the French couldn't really defend anymore when they could have just stated the original claim was null and void because it was nonsense.

Another element of these claims was the non-Christian people had no legitimate claims to anything, even their own personal sovereignty. This was a legalism pronounced by the Catholic church very early on in the age of spanish and portuguese imperialism, which presumably continued on during the french empire's expansion into the fur trade. This claim was absurd from the start, but even moreso after the reformation, which called bullshit on the vatican's copyright on christianity.

Anyway, this all seems nuts to a modern person who might, instead, at least prefer the Dutch/Jew empire approach to "buying" land from Indians with a box of beads, a couple of guns and some booze, oh and also a big piece of paper with some legalisms, aka a contract even if they recognize that's also nonsense. That's the approach the American government eventually adopted as well, which became its policy via Henry Knox during the very early days of the US.

What that generally meant was wealthy cronies involved in the land deals could cash in on bulk land sales to the masses of european settlers when they moved into an area like Ohio or Indiana or Illinois and in fact they, that is the mass of middle class people, truly established sovereignty over an area and implemented "the system".

Another more practical and pragmatic "doctrine" for establishing government claims of ownership to Indian land was the "well, they aren't doing anything with it" claim. That is, since land wasn't surveyed, cleared, cultivated and was in a wild state, nobody owned it, which of course was most of the land in the US since the Indian's economic system and pattern of land use was totally different than the europeans' model. Obviously the use patterns were incompatible which eventually caused much destruction of the Indian population and wildlife in the US.

Let's take a step back to those French "explorers" of the 17th century and their state of mind to make nonsensical claims on behalf of a "king". It's psychotic, meaning, totally divorced from reality, yet it's a psychosis they managed to impose on, at the time, untold thousands of people. The "Sixty Years War" battle for the Old Northwest was really a battle of insane people over whose psychotic episode would be adopted by the masses.

COVID was a great current day example of that. 80% of people around the world adopted the insane, manufactured, scripted perspective sold by a piece of shit human like Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci. I saw friends and family eat that lie up and become a little violent authoritarian creep who wanted to inject people with COVID vaccines by force, even though so many people had that cold before the magic juice was ready. I had out of body experiences during discussions with people about the absurdity of Billy Gates involvement in the farce. I knew Bill was a turd even before the depth of his association with Epstein's cult/mafia were revealed. For some reason average Joe people thought Bill Gates was a credible spokesman for COVAIDs.

I eventually realized it's pointless hoping normie people will "wake up". They never will. They're so accustomed to being psychotic that they'll immediately transfer to the next imaginary thing like an election and a battle between two dirtbag politicians/lawyers and won't even notice nothing changes when the new guys come into office.

COVID followed the Dutch/Jew Empire pattern, by the way, which is why it's such a bummer that the masses are insane retards. That is, the evil wizards/scammers create an imaginary system that the mass of people actually cement into "reality" the same way a box of beads and a piece of paper could create a new State.

Long term patterns

This weekend, our well pump died. I would have preferred to just call somebody and have them replace it, but an emergency plumber or well service would cost several thousand dollars for what's actually a pretty simple DIY repair, so I resigned myself to spending a good portion of Saturday replacing it. It was actually simple since the original installers did a good job, but was still time consuming because there are several steps involved and it all needs to be done carefully for obvious reasons. I'll buy a backup pump and a couple of nice-to-have well pump removal tools in case I have to do it again in the future.

I believe most of the households in my neighborhood have the skills and tools to fix their own stuff like that as well. At least half the households have at least a farm tractor. A number of them have metal working equipment. Some have heavy equipment like an excavator. People rent lifts and take down their own trees, etc... People don't do their own work because they're poor; some of the people have or had a fancy job, like a tech executive or an executive at a tool company or whatever. I think they're a bunch of extremely competent people.

That pattern likely goes back several generations. It does in my family. As I got into my 40s, I realized I was replicating the pattern my grandfather and great grandfather followed by setting up a "hobby farm" mainly because I don't really trust "the system". The "hobby farm" and the competent family is a pretty old scenario. It is and was the typical scenario in the Northern US, and also in several European countries. In the north of the US, the typical scenario for hundreds of years since Europeans settled the continent was  a smallish "subsistence farm" which would provide some portion of necessities, maybe an income, plus a clever person might be able to do some type of value added labor as a small business, or maybe go work for others. The Amish people who live in my area follow this same pattern today.

In the southern US states, though, the plantation system created an aristocratic slave economy. The southern US could grow "cash crops" that were easily monetized by exporting them to Europe. Most of those crops were bulk commodities, like cotton, tobacco, sugar, or whatever, so the money-making model that "worked" was slave labor + giant plantation with minimal overhead. That enabled bankers and other "investors" in Europe to make money with their money by financing such operations too.

I was curious if this scenario persists today, and indeed, it does, though the regional differences get less stark as the generations go by. One bit of evidence for this pattern is the patents per capita by state in the US. There's an obvious split to this day. Basically the subsistence farmers turned into factory workers, engineers, etc... through the industrial revolution. The slave economy of the south, though formally destroyed almost 200 years ago, still affects the pattern of activity and investment in those states many generations later.

Note that "subsistence farming" like the northerners did 200 years ago was replaced with "subsistence factory work", that is a j-o-b, just over broke.

Another pattern that goes way back in the northern US is there is an often uneasy relationship between the wealthy "merchant class" and the northern farmer types who choose to help those people out with their businesses and schemes, versus slaves who were compelled into work. The US federal government serves as a proxy for the northern merchant interests and schemes.

It's interesting the southern plantation class was super influential early on in the US; many of the so called founders of the US were Virginia planters. The plantation owners' influence waned quickly after the very early days of the United States. Really it seems like the "Articles of Confederation" was the southern oriented organizing document of the US, then the US Constitution was the norther oriented one, even though the institution of slavery persisted for a while. 

The "MAGA" movement is a great example of the uneasy relationship between the merchant class people, like Trump and his cronies, and the average dude. The merchant class wanted to reduce labor costs in the US and establish a new type of slavery by importing workers from overseas, or shipping jobs overseas. That undercut wages for the past 50 years. Periodically the merchants have to give the northern farmer types "a new deal". Trump's administration seems like a fraudulent new deal scenario. Some lip service is given to the concerns of the citizenry while the overall screw job of the merchant class continues and even significantly accelerated under Trump.

In the early US there was a conflict between northern subsistence farmer populations and the plantation owner/slave society. Slavery was ostensibly kept out of the "north" for moral reasons, but it was really about the subsistence farmers' ability to make a living. The idea that people who were wiping out the Indians were "moral" about blacks is pretty stupid.

Anyway, it's interesting these patterns last such a long time.

"Legitimacy": the Cornerstone of Fraud

The human mind, like the human body is actually quite limited. For example, some religions prattle on about "eternal life", but people's bodies and minds are in a state of perpetual change and flux, or people have words like "infinite" but the brain considers anything more than 3 "a lot". Another similar concept is "legitimacy" which is at the heart of almost every hierarchical organization, certainly almost every government, even the most despotic governments on Earth claim a "rightful" beginning and reason to continue.

"Legitimate" authorities get people into wars repeatedly, like in Russia and Ukraine right now. The appropriate thing for the people of those countries to do is utterly obliterate their governments and start over. It's astounding that normal people "go to war" on behalf of the creeps and villains in their capital cities.

Maybe 10 or 15 years ago, I got interested in the history of the state of Ohio, specifically the "frontier" period and early statehood. I read up on the treaties that established the "ownership" of the state by, ostensibly, "the government", but it was really a proxy for some east coast psychopath/connected families, which is still true today even though the US is ostensibly a "republic". Anyway, even a pretty casual study of the treaties exposes how scammy they are, in fact they're sort of a magic trick.

The core of the magic trick is, ironically enough, the claim that the Indians "owned" the land that was subsequently incorporated into the US and sold off by wealthy people. Another ingredient was "war". People imagine the people in such a war are all divvied up into "sides", when at the time, the "wars" in the Ohio country were on the scale of high school football games with guns, bows and arrows and knives. Whites and Indians had all sorts of relationships in that era for many years, really centuries prior to the existence of the federal government, and that continued through the era of "wars" that established the "ownership" of Ohio by the feds and some east coast crime families.

Anyway, the "war" leads to a "treaty", yet another fraud, which is basically the end of the magic trick. A couple rando Indians are recognized as President of Indian land. Their signatures on a piece of paper with appropriate ritualistic nonsense form the basis for transferring ownership from the State to private hands via some wealthy family middlemen. Once the masses "buy" the land, they really ratify the treaty that is, they make it "real", while the conmen who setup the whole scheme just put on a big show.

In fact, the settlement of Ohio provides a great example of how that really works, because the state remained contested for several years after some rando Indian dudes signed a piece of paper in Greenville in 1795. Americans didn't move to Ohio in large numbers until after the war of 1812.

In retrospect, had the Indians really understood the scenario they faced, they could have flipped the script on the east coast "ruling class" trash families and just sold off their own land to european settlers. No doubt the east coast British descended mafiosi trash would have staged false flags and similar schemes all along the way, but had the Indians been organized and had leaders with foresight, they could have opened up settlement via the Great Lakes.

Maps and Mental Geography

I recently noticed a USGS benchmark near the intersection of Route 608 and Pearl Road in Hambden Township. Some of the benchmarks were embedded in a boulder, some were mounted to public buildings, like the Chardon Courthouse steps used to have one, and some were mounted in a cast concrete pillar, that presumably went down to bedrock.

Those benchmarks are a relic of the analog era and are no longer used because they're not accurate. For example, the one by Pearl Road is on an angle. Maybe something hit it, or freeze thaw cycles moved it over the decades. There's another one I took a picture of. It's near the Exit of the Hambden Cemetery also along route 608. It's barely legible, and it is also slightly off axis.

Since 2006, the benchmark locations are no longer even marked on the USGS topographic maps. If you want to find one today, you need to go to the historic USGS topo maps website. For example, this 1994 map includes one marked BM 1343 (feet), which was near my childhood home in Munson Township. It was there in the mid 1980s, but as far as I know, it no longer exists.

 

The benchmarks were a physical expression of state authority and part of an otherwise invisible mathematical and algorithmic system for establishing property lines and the like. As such, the markers include a nastygram message to not mess with them; some even include verbiage about fines and jail time.

Now, the invisible property line system is electronic and quite elaborate, and probably significantly more expensive than the old one, which was operated and maintained by literal boots on the ground. It's instructive to delve into the topic in detail if you ever have the need, or are sufficiently curious, but I won't do that here.

The main function of this system is to consistently represent map locations in terms of spherical coordinates, like GPS latitude and longitude coordinates. As a result of this system, anyone who plots a point on a map can go and walk to it in the physical 3D reality world. If you look at aerial photography via google maps or a county auditor web site, or the USGS maps, the same point on the ground maps to the same set of coordinates. This system is actually defined "by statute", which in this particular case is algorithmic and mathematical, but also somewhat arbitrary.

There are more and more of these types of systems cropping up into the real world, that is, a system that's really "algorithmic" or that exists in a computer somewhere, but also has a real world expression. The Flock corporation cameras are a good example of that. This stuff will be creeping into everyone's life over the next few years. Essentially a bunch of shitbird crooks and corporations will claim "ownership" of this or that thing and start new rent seeking scams, or new "enclosure movements" and lay claim to previously un-owned stuff.

Anyway, the thing I really wanted to point out in this post is the vast difference between these systems, even something like a map and associated geodetic models, and the mental model people use. For example, if you go for a walk in the woods on a well known trail, you "know" the trail as a string of essentially 1D places all tied together by your footsteps. When I ride on the big creek park mountain bike trail, even though I've done the thing like dozens of times, I don't generally know where I am with-respect to a map of the area, but I know the order of the features I'll ride over.

There are many more elaborate forms of mental geography like emotional associations, or giving a place a personality that don't show up on a map at all. For example, in our local Geauga County legend of "the melonheads" Wisner Road is scary and spooky, or the Lundgren Barn in Kirtland where a cult killed a family used to be considered spooky and foreboding for many years after that event.

The park "Hell Hollow" is another great example of mental geography. People often associated low spots with a decent into the underworld, and often think of Hell as cold and still say "It's as cold as hell out there", which was a feature of the Germanic mythology of Hel, rather than the "fire and brimstone" Hell of the christians, which I guess never fully caught on with the Germanic peoples.

Canonical Folklore

Stories of "the gods" were campfire stories at some point, and were often based on the characteristics of planets and constellations. A god like osiris in egypt was associated with the constellation Orion which is visible in the winter, then "dies" in spring when the crops are growing. And in those stories, somehow the character associated with some bright lights in the night sky came to be seen as the "sun" on earth as grain.

It seems plausible that people working and living in the field of agriculture would be interested a character like Osiris, while people engaged in other activities of life would be less so, like someone who was a hunter wouldn't care that much about it, or someone who was a builder wouldn't either.

There are characters associated with each of these concerns throughout the different mythological systems, like there are numerous historical builder and blacksmithing gods like the greek Hephaestus or the egyptian Ptah. It seems plausible these different characters filled the same role a modern mascot or advertising character does today.

At some point these stories transform from folklore created and maintained by randos to copyrighted, "canonical" stories under control of the ruling class people of a given region and era. One way that might happen is via public festivals and holidays where the god mascots are in parades and public processions and that kind of thing.

Also, simply by being a popular story and a popular character the ruling class slime of any given era would see the value of these characters as a proxy for the public and controlling it. The mere concept that some aspect of a story is "correct" and canonical while any other version of a story is blasphemy or heresy or whatever is a very basic way to condition people that the dirtbags in power are in control of "all".

Another common ruling class ploy associated with claims of a canonical folklore and its god characters is that the ruling class and its priesthood serves as the intermediary to the god characters based on knowledge and expertise about rituals and sacrifices and all that bullshit. When things are going poorly for the corporate entity of the state and the fortunes of the people are down, like crop failures or plagues happen, they can blame the people for not honoring the gods correctly, or not sacrificing enough to them or whatever.

Amazingly, all this same crap goes on today in an even more strident manner than prior eras and there's a ham fisted attempt to control even comic book characters and popular entertianment on behalf of ruling class chock full of pervs and weirdos like Bill Gates.

World Model that Includes a "Grain God"

The dominant model of the 3D reality world today is the based on the "god of forces", which really isn't a "god" at all in the traditional way. The "deist" concept from the Enlightenment Age sums it up pretty well, where "the creator" made up the rules of gravity, electricity, etc... then set the world in motion, but otherwise has no role in reality.

In prior epochs of the mind, people had a significantly different model of reality that was almost entirely based on what we'd term literary or poetic concepts like "synedoche" or allegories, or similes and metaphors where one thing was understood in terms of another, or where a long story would be referred to by a pithy phrase because everyone knew the story.

These two mental models are significantly different, obviously. The "god of forces" mindset seeks to model the world on first principles and insists any other model of reality is inherently wrong. The goal really seems to be to imitate the "god of forces" by recreating the universe in a computer based on the secret mathematical code of the universe, which is, if you think about it, the ultimate compression algorithm.

An example of the "god of forces" mindset is how the science of biology model of animals is "meat robot", which is why psychopathic trash people torture beagles or rabbits or whatever in "experiments" about diseases or to test some useless consumer product crap like eye makeup or whatever. The common sense understanding of animals is labeled as incorrect, that is assigning human qualities to an animal in some weird, arbitrary hierarchy that's also associated with this version of trash human. In recent years people earned PhDs by providing "scientific proof" of the common sense understanding of how animals behave and think, e.g. they have languages or can reason or dream or whatever.

The poetic universe mental model isn't reductive, it's a sometimes pleasant or pretty conceptualization of what happens in terms of human experience of reality. I think the grain god metaphor is a great example. The "grain god" like Osiris is akin to the Michelin Man who's the cartoon representation of "tireness". 

A character like osiris was a cartoon embodiment of grain. There's a poem by Robert Burns "John Barleycorn" that discusses the personified grain that becomes whiskey which is a good riff on this overall approach.

How did that mental model come to be and what is it? If the "god of forces" mental model came from reductive thinking about the universe that ended up in "peer reviewed" published works, where did the poetic model originate?

I think it's basically "folklore" that got really structured, mainly through repetition. If you live someplace with local legends, like here in Geauga County, Ohio there's a story of "The Melonheads" which I learned in high school, it's easy to see how folklore passes from generation to generation and slowly boils down to a handful of basic archetypal characters and narratives.

Another "local" folklore concept is "the devil's icebox". People in the 1800s realized some low nooks and crannies in local sandstone formations would remain cold and even snow filled far into spring. A number of these places would be get labeled as a "devil's icebox". There's a park in Northeast Ohio called "Hell Hollow", which is a Berea Sandstone formation in eastern Lake County. The "Hell" part comes from the ancient mental geography of "the underworld" or Tartarus in the greek mythology, so the steep decent of the park from the general relief of the surrounding landscape represented a journey to "hell". Obviously,  "cold" spot in such a place would be "the devil's icebox", which is also amusing because another folklore geography of "hell" is it's on fire even though the "underworld" is also associated with winter and Tartarus is cold in the greek mythical geography.

A very good example of how this folklore mindset forms is provided by role playing games like Dungeons and Dragons, where a group of players improvise a shared hallucination... for those people the hallucination is like a movie playing in their minds eye. In the prior era of the mind, this scenario would happen, apparently, fairly often in people's down time, not as a role playing game, but as "shooting the shit" story telling. So a character like osiris or odin or thor would get a story and the universe would get a folklore mythological landscape, like for the Norse, there were 9 worlds.

So how does folklore turn into religion with priests and canonical stories? That's a really interesting one to think about.