Theory of Frozen Tribal Conflict

The people of Europe lived in tribal societies before the Roman Empire, and after the collapse of the Roman Empire. These tribes were essentially vast extended families. As a result of living in the same place for a long time, the people of a region came to have genetic similarities. Their way of life and religious beliefs came to be an expression of their DNA.

Subsequently, all these people were pushed into nation states, and into various Empires, and most importantly their local religions were stripped away and replaced with European Christianity, which seems to be a blend of their old beliefs and an imported mystery religion, desert religion. (The thing that remains for most post-Christianity Europeans is the Christmas tree.)

An Empire, like the Roman Empire, the Mongol Empire, the Ottoman Empire, various european empires or the current Western Empire is actually the domination of one tribe over the others and the introduction of a synthetic religion that cloaks this arrangement, plus the creation of bureaucratic systems that abstract the forms of local government that flow naturally from a tribal life.

It's quite possible that so many people feel disaffected with the current Western Empire because it makes no sense to them on a genetic level. Ancient, long forgotten grudges still simmer. Wars in the middle east make sense to the grandsons of Crusaders and to the Jews, but probably not so much to some Germans or Celts.

The alt-media, and conspiracy culture tends to focus on "the Jews" as a potential cause of their woes, but don't ever look at other "white" people, having totally forgotten the tribal cultures of their ancestors, and the history of tribal conflict. Some people in the alt-media obsess on the "Jewish question".

The "Western Empire" really seems to be, though, the British Empire with the capital moved to DC/NY from London. It really seems plausible we live in Norman world; from the very beginning (Norman England and Italy), and maybe through today the Normans had multicultural societies arranged as bureaucracies and tax farms where Jewish people served in important roles, but weren't sitting on the throne.

It's possible that this lineage of Normans is consciously maintained through institutions like elite universities, or secret societies like Skull & Bones. It's also possible that it's a natural outgrowth of human behavioral patterns. Once these relationships of ruled/tax farmed and rulers are established, they can last a long time without conscious planning.

Anyway, this is a new idea for me, so I'll be exploring it a while.

Parochial Became Universal

One remarkable and odd aspect of western history is the parochial myths, folk tales, and fables of the Jewish tribes recorded in the Bible displaced traditions of the peoples of Europe and became the universal story of mankind. Well, for many western people, anyway.

The Destruction of Irminsul by Charlemagne

This is remarkable because for all of human history, there were as many origin stories as there were tribes. There were as many navels of the world, and as many axis mundi as there were tribes. The Bible was just one edition of this genre. If you imagine a theatrical stage where all the competing legendary patriarchs and founders of the past competed for the attention of the audience, it'd be bristling with dozens of characters like Romulus and Remus, Achilles, Odysseus, or Paris and Priam or a Celeus or Demophon or Brutus of Britain.

It's strange that the Bible's desert wandering, donkey riding cast of characters got promoted to the front and center of the stage of European religion while the rest of the characters of Northern European mythology were demoted to, at best, fictional character status or were even forgotten. Very few people today would think Odin or Zeus were historical figures, yet many people in the western world readily conflate Exodus with history and imagine that story is our, that is, Western people's patrimony rather than an alien invasive fable.

At various times and in various places,  authorities introduced new gods or created new religions to bring people of diverse backgrounds together. For example, the Ptolomies created the cult and god Serapis to unite Egyptian and Greek citizens. Christianity was similarly imposed on European people through a mix of violent coercion, cross-cultural curiosity, education, and genuine fervor for new religious ideas.

It seems that Christianity adopted features of the Roman Empire as a universal religion that could be aggressively imposed. While nobody really knows how or why the feudal lords of post-Roman Europe adopted Christianity as their creed, perhaps some clues are provided by Charlemagne's reign.

Migration Period Europe

A main problem of the feudal lords of Europe was uniting heterogeneous tribes within rather arbitrary territorial boundaries. The tribe as an extended family was an ancient institution with roots going back into the mists of time. (See this post about the Zombie Apocalypse and de-tribing Europe) A feature of tribal life was tribal religion, which connected the people with their ancient ancestors, their rulers, and their gods. These connections had the side effect of forming political boundaries. That is the people of a region answered to their own chieftains and had their own unique opinions about what was important and what could motivate them.

Serf's Up Brah! Mow this Field with a Knife!

Christianity, perhaps, was an obvious reagent that could dissolve those bonds and could be used to separate people from their ancient institutions and beliefs and draft them into new parasitic systems.

(I should note here that I am not nostalgic for, nor advocating a return to the tribal systems of more ancient times. There's really no reason to believe those arrangements were more rational, more just, or less oppressive than modern systems or even feudal systems.)

Hence, while many people imagine Christianity was successful in Europe owing to some specific features of the religion that made it a tonic for the people, an alternate explanation is that its success is a historic accident and its unique features were the Caesar-like ambitions and corresponding universalism of the church fathers, and Christianity's utility as a psy-op for feudal warlords.