Is it possible to simply reverse the roles of the symbol using mind and its relationship with the external world and nature? Where the oafish symbol using mind attempts to impose simplistic plans and order on the natural world, can it instead follow hints from nature?
The symbol using mind conflates its plans and models with "reality"--a very common outcome of this approach is abject failure and sometimes monstrous destruction as the symbol mind tries to obliterate all that is counter to its feeble schemes. Can language and symbolic representations flow from the complexity of nature instead of the mind of a man?
No comments:
Post a Comment